Re: VOTE YES: eXIf 2017-0119
Cosmin Truta <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Feb 2017 01:44:36 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAoVtZzeNiTvxgRQu-13SBchDBjnxhBWkg6-A1skKJyXykh+-Q@mail.gmail.com> |
YES eXIf 2017-0119 ftp://ftp.simplesystems.org/pub/png-group/documents png-proposed-eXIf-chunk-2017-0119.html Cosmin Truta <[email protected]> I would have preferred a compressed version, but the current one ("zXIF") is far away in the process pipeline, and, even more importantly, that one is (unfortunately) unsafe-to-copy. As I had said from the very beginning, I am strongly supporting a safe-to-copy EXIF, and I am weakly supporting a compressed EXIF. Strongly-supporting a safe-to-copy EXIF chunk means: I would vote "yes" for a safe-to-copy EXIF (such as this one), and "no" for an unsafe-to-copy EXIF (such as the currently-proposed "zXIF"), for reasons already stated. Weakly-supporting a compressed EXIF chunk means: I would debate in the favor of a compressed EXIF instead of an uncompressed one, but I would still vote "yes" for either version (hence my "yes" vote here). Sincerely, Cosmin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot