Re: DRAFT: eXIf 2017-0210

> 
>     On February 10, 2017 at 8:32 AM Cosmin Truta <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>     I like it.
> 
>         > > 
> >         There is no expectation that any thumbnails present in the Exif profile
> >         have been updated (or have not been updated) if the main image was changed.
> > 
> >     > 
>     This is a good clarification, to appease the people who oppose the
>     proposal on the grounds that EXIF data should have been
>     unsafe-to-copy.
> 
>     Perhaps move this clarification into the section "eXIf Recommendations
>     for Decoders"? The "no expectation" clause applies to decoders only,
>     in my opinion. In addition, an EXIF-enabled encoder may very well
>     choose to update the thumbnails.
> 


I"d rather not move it somewhere that it's less likely to be seen.


How about


"While encoders may choose to update them, there is no expectation..."


Glenn

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

_______________________________________________
png-mng-misc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc