Re: CFD: eXIF 2017-0207
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:46:11 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+PdXcuw+UDkO5j0HGJ0iKxjBpdd0=P9=bLuCPWRQKhKf6nLGw@mail.gmail.com> |
Tomorrow I'll update the eXIf proposal with this: 135c135,139 < This chunk does not introduce additional security issues. --- > The Exif specification does not contain a requirement that > tag "value offset" pointers actually point to a valid address > within the file (see Paragraph 4.6.2). Although this seems to be > an implicit requrement, decoders should be prepared to encounter invalid > pointers and deal with them appropriately. On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:59 PM, John Bowler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson > <[email protected]> wrote: >> This seems to be worth mentioning in the Security Considerations, >> namely that decoders should be prepared to encounter tag offsets >> that reference data outside the chunk data segment. > > Yes, I believe it is [...] Glenn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot