Re: DRAFT: PngReg 2017-02-15

No one has commented on this draft.  Should we go ahead
with another CFD, or are there still things needing to be
fixed before that?

Glenn


On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> DRAFT
> PngReg 2017-02-15
> http://www.simplesystems.org/png-group/proposals/PngReg/history/
> png-registration-draft-2017-02-15.txt
> Glenn Randers-Pehrson
>
> This is a draft for discussion prior to a formal "call for discussion".
>
> Changes from the previous draft of 2017-0125, which failed to pass:
>
> 1) Draft phase preceding formal 2-week discussion period
> with informal consensus before formal discussion
>
> 2) Mention http site in addition to ftp site for active discussions
>
> 3) No changes, not even trivial editorial changes, permitted during
> the 2-week formal discussion period without resetting the 2-week clock
>
> I hope this satisfactorily addresses concerns from Chris and John.
> I didn't add anything about etiquette which seems to me should go without
> saying.
>
> Glenn

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot