Re: DRAFT: eXIf 2017-02-28
Pavel Zlatovratskii <[email protected]> Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:23:31 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | TB.Budget |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Repeat question about 64k and paragraph 4.5.2 instead of 4.7.2 Is there any reason to adopt adoption of TIFF header for JPEG? Isn't adopt TIFF header directly more simple? 28.02.2017 4:30, Glenn Randers-Pehrson пишет: > DRAFT > eXIf 2017-02-28 > http://www.simplesystems.org/png-group/proposals/eXIf/ > png-proposed-eXIf-chunk-2017-02-28.html > Glenn Randers-Pehrson > > The only change from the draft of 2017-02-15 is to state > "Only one eXIf chunk is allowed in a PNG datastream." > instead of "Multiple eXIf chunks are not forbidden." > > Glenn > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > png-mng-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc -- Have a nice DOS. Pavel Zlatovratskii [email protected]; [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ png-mng-misc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc