Re: DRAFT: eXIF 2017-03-05
Cosmin Truta <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Mar 2017 22:55:30 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAoVtZyz4dps2zeVEZG2PWQ+oy-3xAH3cdem84E3K3EPeZLXzA@mail.gmail.com> |
On 6 March 2017 at 22:44, Willem van Schaik <[email protected]> wrote: > A bit nitpicking here, but we could say "in the Intel little endian byte > order" and "in the Motorola big endian byte order". Agreed. We may as well not even mention "Intel" and "Motorola", given that these names have historical significance only, and are otherwise outside the scope of this spec. (To find that out, there is Wikipedia.) So making the text short and sweet may be the even-better thing to do here. (But again, I'm ok either with or without my proposed change.) 73, 73, 42, 0 (ASCII "II", followed by the TIFF version number in the little-endian byte order) or 77, 77, 0, 42 (ASCII "MM", followed by the TIFF version number in the big-endian byte order) Sincerely, Cosmin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition. http://sdm.link/oxford