Re: CALL for DISCUSSION: eXIf 20170115 -- length
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:20:49 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+PdXcvjvA33-AVrzCkWXuGG42Gj_3_Bka8T_5JsyNo2ZPKxuA@mail.gmail.com> |
Images from my Nikon B700 contain a small thumbnail in the Exif data, and they also contain a larger preview with about 1Mpix -- it happens to be the same image that's shown on the viewfinder and onboard display screen. I haven't figured out exactly where it resides in the file; ImageMagick does not preserve it when copying the image. Glenn On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:37 AM, John Bowler < [email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Willem van Schaik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > and maybe we should add: > > > > It will often end with 0xFFD9 (there could be a padding byte > > 0x00) which is the EXIF EOI (End of Image) marker, because > > many EXIF profiles end with a thumbnail image. > > So far as I know there is no reason for the thumbnail to be at the end > even though the CIPA document shows it there and there is no reason > for the thumbnail to be a JPEG stream. Indeed if the main image is > uncompressed the thumbnail cannot be compressed while if the main > image is compressed an uncompressed thumbnail may be used. > > See the discussion on page 24 of CIPA 2016. > > Some professional cameras (maybe all of them) offer TIFF as an output > format. Since those files are uncompressed conversion to PNG may be > attractive. The conversion has to add the JPEG "Exif\0\0" tag to the > TIFF Exif information but that's relatively little cost (just 6 bytes) > compared to the likely gain of the compression of the main image. In > those images the thumbnail could easily be anywhere; it has a fixed > size. > > In any case a program which edits the image will probably reconstruct > or discard the thumbnail; digikam does this even if it doesn't edit > the image because it adds its own fields to the Exif metadata. (Well, > actually, I looked at the code - it reads the chunk in with exiv2 then > writes it out using exiv2 which completely reconstructs it.) > > So far as I can see it isn't possible to rely on anything apart from > the TIFF header being anywhere; it is necessary to read the IFDs and > follow the pointers (offsets) to the relevant data. > > -- > John Bowler <[email protected]> > +1 (541) 450-9885 > PO BOX 3151 > KERBY OR 97531-3151 > USA > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > png-mng-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ png-mng-misc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc