Re: DRAFT: eXIF 2017-05-28
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> Tue, 30 May 2017 07:03:12 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+PdXcsD0j61vb6XqmaetKMd1NsJ+y2_34jKS2wZj9L3hpOy6g@mail.gmail.com> |
Just to be clear, I too greatly prefer eXIf (safe-to-copy) over eXIF (unsafe-to-copy) because it does a better job of preserving valuable historical information. Approval of eXIf wouldn't require applications such as pngcrush/optipng to do anything new, while eXIF would require them to issue a new version to handle eXIF as if it were safe-to-copy when it's not making changes that would render that information incorrect. If you like, you may consider the eXIF proposal to be a strawman designed to resurrect the discussion of eXIf, which is still an active proposal despite discussion having lapsed. Glenn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot