Re: CFD: eXIf 2017-05-31

Cosmin Truta <[email protected]> Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:13:55 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.png.general
Message-ID <CAAoVtZzkSbtTz=66NH-5M3kEBzjc=kw1qsPDVx6_wWCfWz3qnA@mail.gmail.com>
On 1 June 2017 at 09:00, Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote:
> Probably your document ought to mention the privacy
> concern about the possibility that people might post
> a cropped image that unbeknownst to them also
> contains a thumbnail of the uncropped image.

Yes, thank you. That would go in the list of common EXIF issues, not
specific to PNG.

> That
> is of course not a problem introduced by the PNG
> eXIf chunk but by Exif itself no matter what the
> image format.

Right. And that is not even the only EXIF problem that is not
PNG-specific. I might as well split the article it in two: one part
with general EXIF caveats, and the other part with PNG-specific issues
and motivation behind our design decisions.

I found that people are generally more receptive to what I write if I
keep my content short. It's a challenge in this particular case,
because there are lots of things to be mentioned. But splitting the
content in two might do the trick.

Sincerely,
Cosmin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot