Re: CFD: eXIf 2017-05-31
Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:57:12 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+PdXcsmOzQ-wPjaNNTcmkJPPc2g7vAex3E9LEQGZHYvvjKWHg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Pavel Zlatovratskii <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 02.06.2017 17:33, Glenn Randers-Pehrson пишет: >> >> >>>> Exceptions are specific software development scenarios where you happen >>>> to >>>> have >>>> "independent knowledge" -- which is when you happen to *know* that the >>>> EXIF data is coming from a source within your trust and control. But >>>> these are only exceptions. >>> >>> I think there is no need to specify such exceptions in main >>> specification. >> >> I don't think the current proposal lists such exceptions. They appear in >> a table in the Exif spec. > > By "exception" I mean sentence "a decoder has independent knowledge of the > validity of the Exif data,". > If decoder have a truly trustworthy knowledge about validity of the EXIF > data then it already know what to do. We already tried a proposal without that sentence and it was voted down. The sentence is there to help make the proposal acceptable. Glenn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ png-mng-misc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc