Re: CFD: eXIf 2017-06-09b
Phil Harvey <phil-CIeU6mJ2MbMd166Dz3SrqbDks+cytr/[email protected]> Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:36:05 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: Glenn Randers-Pehrson <[email protected]> > I removed some of the JPEG-specific details so the recommendation > now reads, in the 2017-06-09b version, > > While the PNG specification allows the chunk size to be as large as > 2^31-1 bytes, application authors should be aware that, if the Exif profile > is going to be written to a JPEG datastream, the total length of the eXIf > chunk data may need to be adjusted to not exceed 2^16-9 bytes, so it can fit > into a JPEG APP1 marker. Great. I apologize for making another suggestion, but calling it a "JPEG APP1 Exif segment" would be more accurate than a "JPEG APP1 marker" because the 6-byte Exif00 header is specific to the APP1 Exif segment. Also, a "marker" is technically the two bytes at the start of a segment (0xff 0xe1 in this case) that identify the type of segment. - Phil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot