Re: Call for informal discussion: APNG
"Soni L." <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:05:06 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.png.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2017-09-14 08:51 PM, Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote: > It really only needs two things to get my vote. That is to recommend > the extension .apng instead of .png > in the filenames, and to define a different MIME type. In fact, > mozilla has pursued the separation of apng > from png to the extent of recommending a different internet mime type. > They registered image/vnd.mozilla.apng > (see http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/image/vnd.mozilla.apng) in 2015 > but then decided they didn't like that, and put in the APNG spec: > "APNG can be identified using > the image/apng MIME type." without anyone's approval, with someone Ah, the good ol' standardized by coercion. I like it :) > stating in the > bugzilla report words to the effect, "we'll deal with IANA later". > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Chris Lilley <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is a call for informal discussion on APNG - specifically, the three >> chunks acTL, fcTL, and fdAT. >> >> These chunks have been discussed before, and voted on before. Per the rules >> for registration: >> >> The same chunk cannot be brought up again for another discussion >> period and vote either until a 180-day waiting period has elapsed, to >> allow for implementation and testing, or until a substantial change >> to the specification is made. >> >> APNG failed voting on 20 April 2007, which is more than 180 days ago: >> >> FAILED >> APNG 20070405a >> ftp://ftp.simplesystems.org/pub/png-group/documents/ >> png-apng-proposal-20070405a.txt >> >> Voting has closed on the APNG proposal. There were 8 YES >> votes, 10 NO votes, no abstentions, and no ineligble votes >> cast. The proposal has failed and the APNG chunks are not >> registered. >> >> My reason for re-opening discussion is the "implementation and testing" >> part. APNG has since become widespread. Compared to animated GIF, it offers >> 24bit (and 48bit!) colors rather than 256, and full transparency rather than >> binary opacity. >> >> Regardless of what we may think about the reduced capabilities relative to >> MNG, or the advisability of re-using an image type for animations, this is >> the current state of the world and it seems sub-optimal to me that the PNG >> specification and extensions documents continue to not reflect this. I would >> like therefore to kick off informal discussion, then a formal discussion >> period and (re)vote. >> >> APNG continues to be supported in Mozilla Firefox (and other apps using the >> Gecko rendering engine), starting from version 3, June 2008. >> >> APNG is supported by Safari (and other apps using the WebKit rendering >> engine) since version 8, October 2014. >> >> In addition, native apps on MacOS X and iOS use native support for APNG, >> since iOS 10 and OS X Yosemite, October 2014. >> >> APNG is now supported by Google Chrome (and other apps using the Blink >> rendering engine, such as Opera and Samsung Internet), starting from version >> 59, June 2017. >> >> Microsoft Edge does not support APNG, but MS Edge Devs stated that this is >> "under review". Meanwhile, APNG displays in Edge as the first frame, which >> is the expected fallback behavior. >> >> A starter document is attached to facilitate discussion. >> >> -- >> Chris Lilley >> @svgeesus >> Technical Director @ W3C >> W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design >> W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> png-mng-misc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > png-mng-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/png-mng-misc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot