Re: SANE with Samsung SCX-4x21F Getting IO Error
sqe6nouc--- via sane-devel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.scanning.sane.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, Hope you are having a great day. The output from the command as follow: > ➜ scanimage -L > device `xerox_mfp:libusb:003:023' is a SAMSUNG ORION multi-function peripheral > device `smfp:usb;04e8;3419;SERIALNUMBERREDACTED.' is a Samsung SCX-4x21 Series on USB Scanner I have already tried both and both didn't scan. The result from the previous email is from the xerox_mfp one Thank you very much. On 2024/01/17 7:04, Ralph Little wrote: > Hi, > > On 2024-01-14 06:20, sqe6nouc--- via sane-devel wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am currently trying to get SANE to scan with a Samsung SCX-4x21F MFP >> on Arch Linux. >> >> I have sane 1.2.1-5 and xsane 0.999-6 on kernel 6.6.10-arch1-1 (KDE >> Plasma Wayland) with the following driver packages: >> >> samsung-unified-driver 1.00.39-7 >> samsung-unified-driver-common 1.00.39-7 >> samsung-unified-driver-printer 1.00.39-7 >> samsung-unified-driver-scanner 1.00.39-7 >> >> dmesg: >> >> [75005.102178] usb 3-9: new full-speed USB device number 6 using xhci_hcd >> [75005.245210] usb 3-9: New USB device found, idVendor=04e8, >> idProduct=3419, bcdDevice= 1.00 >> [75005.245235] usb 3-9: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, >> SerialNumber=3 >> [75005.245245] usb 3-9: Product: SCX-4x21 Series >> [75005.245248] usb 3-9: Manufacturer: Samsung >> [75005.245249] usb 3-9: SerialNumber: <serial redacted>. >> [75005.926529] usblp 3-9:1.1: usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 6 >> if 1 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04E8 pid 0x3419 >> [75005.926577] usbcore: registered new interface driver usblp >> >> Error I am getting: >> Failed to start scanner: Error during device I/O >> >> If I wait a bit then click scan again, it starts scanning, however the >> scan head stuck at the end of the flatbed and XSane hangs for a bit >> then the following error is shown: >> Error during read: Error during device I/O >> >> After this, the scan head is still stuck at the end of the flatbed >> >> Any help would be appreciated. Thank you. >> > > I wonder why the xerox_mfp backend wouldn't provide you with support for > this device. You have a very recent version of the backends and it is > supposed to be supported. > Could you show us the output of: > > scanimage -L > > Cheers, > Ralph