Re: SANE with Samsung SCX-4x21F Getting IO Error

sqe6nouc--- via sane-devel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.scanning.sane.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello,


Hope you are having a great day. The output from the command as follow:

 >  ➜ scanimage -L
 > device `xerox_mfp:libusb:003:023' is a SAMSUNG ORION multi-function 
peripheral
 > device `smfp:usb;04e8;3419;SERIALNUMBERREDACTED.' is a Samsung 
SCX-4x21 Series on USB Scanner


I have already tried both and both didn't scan. The result from the 
previous email is from the xerox_mfp one

Thank you very much.

On 2024/01/17 7:04, Ralph Little wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2024-01-14 06:20, sqe6nouc--- via sane-devel wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am currently trying to get SANE to scan with a Samsung SCX-4x21F MFP 
>> on Arch Linux.
>>
>> I have sane 1.2.1-5 and xsane 0.999-6 on kernel 6.6.10-arch1-1 (KDE 
>> Plasma Wayland) with the following driver packages:
>>
>> samsung-unified-driver 1.00.39-7
>> samsung-unified-driver-common 1.00.39-7
>> samsung-unified-driver-printer 1.00.39-7
>> samsung-unified-driver-scanner 1.00.39-7
>>
>> dmesg:
>>
>> [75005.102178] usb 3-9: new full-speed USB device number 6 using xhci_hcd
>> [75005.245210] usb 3-9: New USB device found, idVendor=04e8, 
>> idProduct=3419, bcdDevice= 1.00
>> [75005.245235] usb 3-9: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, 
>> SerialNumber=3
>> [75005.245245] usb 3-9: Product: SCX-4x21 Series
>> [75005.245248] usb 3-9: Manufacturer: Samsung
>> [75005.245249] usb 3-9: SerialNumber: <serial redacted>.
>> [75005.926529] usblp 3-9:1.1: usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 6 
>> if 1 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04E8 pid 0x3419
>> [75005.926577] usbcore: registered new interface driver usblp
>>
>> Error I am getting:
>> Failed to start scanner: Error during device I/O
>>
>> If I wait a bit then click scan again, it starts scanning, however the 
>> scan head stuck at the end of the flatbed and XSane hangs for a bit 
>> then the following error is shown:
>> Error during read: Error during device I/O
>>
>> After this, the scan head is still stuck at the end of the flatbed
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
>>
> 
> I wonder why the xerox_mfp backend wouldn't provide you with support for 
> this device. You have a very recent version of the backends and it is 
> supposed to be supported.
> Could you show us the output of:
> 
> scanimage -L
> 
> Cheers,
> Ralph
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.