Re: 0.34 Beta1 Windows builds
Lauris Kaplinski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.sodipodi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello! Jon A. Cruz kirjutas P, 08.02.2004 kell 08:59: > >There are still different builds for Win2000/XP and 9X/ME. They > >are almost the same, except #define UNICODE in certain places > >in Win2000/XP build (we have still not managed to get everything > >working with unicows.dll) > I'm looking into that issue in general. My research has, however, been > slowed a bit by getting a new job. Given that the bulk of Win32 calls > are encapsulated and they are also not used extensively, it appears that > unicows.dll might not even be needed. We definitely want to use wide fileops whenever possible, otherwise we cannot support multilingual filenames other than default locale. Do you think we can check for unicode support run-time, and choose between xyzA/xyzW methods then? Best wishes, Lauris Kaplinski ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn