Re: 0.34 Beta1 Windows builds

Lauris Kaplinski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.graphics.sodipodi
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello!

Jon A. Cruz kirjutas P, 08.02.2004 kell 08:59:
> >There are still different builds for Win2000/XP and 9X/ME. They
> >are almost the same, except #define UNICODE in certain places
> >in Win2000/XP build (we have still not managed to get everything
> >working with unicows.dll)

> I'm looking into that issue in general. My research has, however, been 
> slowed a bit by getting a new job. Given that the bulk of Win32 calls 
> are encapsulated and they are also not used extensively, it appears that 
> unicows.dll might not even be needed.

We definitely want to use wide fileops whenever possible, otherwise we 
cannot support multilingual filenames other than default locale.
Do you think we can check for unicode support run-time, and choose
between xyzA/xyzW methods then?

Best wishes,
Lauris Kaplinski




-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.