Re: Where's those flying monkeys?

At this stage of the game, I think arch access is pretty much a 
pre-requisite, best start learning it.  (And yeah, I'm a hypocrite, I 
haven't learned arch and haven't contributed jack yet, I'm just lurking 
and providing hypocritical insight :)

Brandon

William Lahti wrote:

>well itd be nice if there was another service release that fixed 0.2.1
>because it hasn't built at all for me or that other guy who mailed the
>list awhile back. Apparently it wasn't fault of ours but a bug in the
>build process so couldnt that be released from a stable pull from
>arch? It'd be wonderful because I've been kinda bored lately and want
>to help with Y like I told Mark I would so long ago (I had been quite
>busy). But I can't really help if I don't have something to try and
>I'm not really up to grabbing it from Arch yet as I'm still not fully
>accustomed to it.
>
>On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:06:50 -0400, Casey Winans <[email protected]> wrote:
>  
>
>>On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 09:50, Cupp, Matthew R wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Ding dong the Y is dead?
>>>
>>>Is version 0.3 ready yet?  Is anybody still working on stuff?
>>>
>>>Sorry if this sounds like another "echo" email, but the list has died
>>>off again and version 0.3 is a little behind schedule.  So I just
>>>thought I'd check.
>>>      
>>>
>>It does that (dies that is) from time to time. I imagine Mark has been
>>overly busy at work and/or in his personal life again. It would be nice
>>if an effort was at least made to let the list know when he'd be taking
>>a hiatus. Or maybe Andrew Suffield could give us an update since he's
>>the guy making most of the changes to the Y internals.
>>
>>--
>>Casey Winans <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>    
>>