Re: Where's those flying monkeys?
Michael Latiolais <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.y.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
So, are there plans to patch the arch version of Y? I believe that asuffield mentioned a changeset, but I have never tracked it down. I would like to get a clean build on the main tree if possible. Jost Boekemeier wrote: >>OK. Now where is the changeset that fixes it the Right Way? >> >> > >Both, the latest version of Y+ and Messina (will be online next month) >should work. These are forks of an old Y code base before it was messed >up, but don't have much in common with Y anymore. > > > > >>1) As I've understand the docs, y-windows reduces the data, sent >>between the Y Server and the application, >> >> > >Yes, but it doesn't mean that Y applications start or work faster. In a >high latency network with 1 second latency creating a 4 node application >tree on the Y server takes 8 round-trips, 8 seconds + the time to >flatten the tree into an image on the server-side. > > > > >>When using the canvas widget, wouldn't that break that technique? >> >> > >Yes, using a canvas with owner-drawn widgets (for example via Gtk/Cairo) >instead of the Y protocol will help. > > > > >>porting gtk >> >> > >That's a non issue. There will be a gdk/cairo backend. Florian's Y+ >server as well as Messina already incorporate Cairo as the backend. So >everything is there. > > >Jost > > > > > > > >