Re: Phil meet y-devel; y-devel meet Phil
Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.y.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <91997396527d306b3703ed42974c3c8b@master> |
On 2004-07-19 08:30:39 +0800 Andrew Suffield <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:01:59AM +0200, JP Dinger wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 10:14:20PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: >>> > > XFree86/X.Org driver stealing. >>> > > > So I can use native Y without wasting my GeForce FX. >>> > Their drivers suck. You will regret this. You have been warned. >>> > Frankly I'd rather get hold of the hardware documentation and do >>> it >>> from scratch. >> >> That'd be cool. Now, where'd that stack of sooper seekrit hardware >> documentation go. I had it here just a minute ago. I wasn't allowed >> to read it, NDAs all over, but what the hey. > > <shrug> Your own silly fault for buying the wrong > hardware. Reverse-engineer it if you really care. > Nvidia will eventually release the docs dont worry. I will in the meantime focus on those with docs available. Why waste time reverse engineering. >>> > > GL support. >>> > > > Shouldn't be too hard to rig up a pass-through for the SDL >>> hosted >>> versions. >>> > Doing it native will be trickier unless we've managed to nick X >>> drivers. >>> > Excuse me while I vomit. All the existing free GL implementations >>> are >>> vile devilspawn. They're even worse than xfree86 drivers. >> Why bother with all that stuff. Focus on GL. >> Please do clean up when you're done. I'm not so much interested in >> your >> sentiment as in knowing why you feel that way. That, you are more >> than >> welcome to share and explain. Do enlighten us. > > Go read the code for yourself. > Yes. Oh and enlighten others too. Hehe. Im was confused myself but with someone elses help i was able to find my way around. Next time the other guy had a problem i helped him out. Off list of course.