Re: Re: about your concept

On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 07:52:48PM +0200, Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
> What I would like to know is, how are these things solved in other large 
> Open-Source projects, like KDE or the kernel? Linus sure have a lot more time 
> to spend on kernel-maintenance than you seem to have, but the very pressure 
> and amount of patches submitted to the Linux kernel is also a LOT larger than 
> Y. How is the kernel development organized so that Linus doesn't have to work 
> 28 hours/day reviewing patches?

The thread's called "Linus doesn't scale", from about two years ago
(from shortly after the point where Linus no longer had enough
non-sleeping hours in the day to review the number of patches
revceived in a day). They use bitkeeper. We use arch.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBABvTlpK98RSteX8RAmypAJ9ZG1wPJjnN/v9sTDJhrGXVU94b3wCghyNd
9WO6SeZbNXSnSsFEG7ZCqBY=
=QV51
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----