Re: Activity, Andrew?

I, too was hoping too see something going on here. As I stated a while
back, this project is just what I was looking for.
Is the project dead? Should there be someone taking over, or splitting
off and taking the project in their own direction? It seems to me that
enough work has been done that this would make a good base for
another, similar project, but I had hoped that this project would
progress a bit on its own.
Like Jonas, I don't mean to offend anyone, I am just curious what's going on.
I guess I could start fixing things in the code as a contribution, and
that might help it along...

Hmm, I might just have to do that. Of course, I might not do things
the way you guys want them, so I'm a bit hesitant. Not that you'd have
to accept my changes...but now I'm babbling here.
Anyhow, great project so far, hope to see it keep on going.

-Paul


On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:34:50 +0100, Jonas Fietz <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> sorry to bring this subject up again, but I haven't heard anything from
> the two core developers about any advancements. The arch-archives is
> outdated by half a year, the wiki is offline now.
> So my question is, are you guys still doing anything? I mean, just read
> an eMail from Andrew Suffield, so he still seems to be reading the list.
> What about a short summary about the activity going on and maybe telling
> ~ interested people where some up-to-date code is.
> 
> Jonas
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFBhTBKLDPKnnhOBOYRAiH1AJ9snkDs2kWEfSdxSHWLdbLM2QuhGACcDj9g
> ryMSVPJDzaGCM4zC6el5Wuc=
> =Ifa0
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 


-- 
"C++ also supports the notion of *friends*: cooperative classes that
are permitted to see each other's private parts." - Grady Booch