Re: Quick question... Is this project dead?!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David McBride wrote:
| I don't understand how you've came to this conclusion, but it certainly
| isn't true for me; my day job keeps me so busy that, by the time I
| finish work for the day, I need any remaining moments of the day to
| rest.  The last I heard from Phil or Mark, they were both in a similar
| situation.
|
| Until that changes, patches from us are going to be a little thin on the
| ground.
See, that is the first clear statement in months. So, how was the person
above me wrong with stating the project is dead? Maybe Phil, Mark or you
should just say they are willing to give a total control.
The whole time, if you read through the archive, it seemed like there
had been at least some kind of advancement, which hadn't yet been
transfered to the main arch. So I understand why noone was willing to do
any work; why if the last the development concerning statement was, that
there had been a substantial rewrite...

Anyway, I don't care, I'll unsubscribe...



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB6ugBydrGfzV1md0RAk28AJ4wi+dYKWVYw+G4kQulPDMJC+1DcACggk7Q
rJVS80BFKrbZpdqyu3WPZlg=
=7lkX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----