Fwd: dropping sigc++

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rogelio Serrano <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:55:52 +0800
Subject: Re: [Y-devel] dropping sigc++
To: James Harr <[email protected]>


On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:53:56 +0800, Rogelio Serrano
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:47:46 -0600, James Harr <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I don't really see how this is possible, unless you want to drop the C++
> > libraries. Because sigc++ is kind of the cornerstone of it...
> >
> > On Sunday 16 January 2005 11:18 pm, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
> > > Anybody has a plan to make sigc++ optional?
> >
> > --
> > James Harr <[email protected]>
> > http://www.grickle.org/
> >
>
> I see.
>
> I doubt if c++ can be made optional either since autoconf requires
> c++. Its a bug I think but its not fixed yet.
>

I will drop autoconf then.

It looks like i can still do something useful with this project.

--
Blood is thicker than water... and much tastier
                                           John Davidorff Pell


-- 
Blood is thicker than water... and much tastier
                                           John Davidorff Pell