Re: dropping sigc++
Brandon Black <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:45:03 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.y.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:59:10 +0800, Rogelio Serrano <[email protected]> wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Rogelio Serrano <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:55:52 +0800 > Subject: Re: [Y-devel] dropping sigc++ > To: James Harr <[email protected]> > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:53:56 +0800, Rogelio Serrano > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:47:46 -0600, James Harr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't really see how this is possible, unless you want to drop the C++ > > > libraries. Because sigc++ is kind of the cornerstone of it... > > > > > > On Sunday 16 January 2005 11:18 pm, Rogelio Serrano wrote: > > > > Anybody has a plan to make sigc++ optional? > > > > > > -- > > > James Harr <[email protected]> > > > http://www.grickle.org/ > > > > > > > I see. > > > > I doubt if c++ can be made optional either since autoconf requires > > c++. Its a bug I think but its not fixed yet. > > > > I will drop autoconf then. > > It looks like i can still do something useful with this project. > What exactly is the point of dropping sigc++? And this autoconf part of this thread makes no sense. Removing autoconf from the project (why on earth would one do that?) would not obviate the need for sigc++.