Re: Quick question... Is this project dead?!

On Monday 17 January 2005 20:57, Jonathan Harper wrote:

> The options are therefore 1) fork or 2) rewrite. Sitting around isn't going
> to get us anywhere, as Phil and Andrew have repeatedly said, because it's
> more of a private project than anything.

Either way, do "we" or whoever will take the lead, know what he is doing?  Did 
the "cabal" have some good ideas that are not said here yet, that they were 
planning to include in their rewrite?

I think there was also something in Mark's original design that got some 
rethinking after this "first try", but I just can't put my finger on what 
exactly was it.  Maybe something about latency vs. bandwidth.

Btw, what would be the difference between a fork and a rewrite, now that 
Mark&co aren't going to do it?

-Kimmo S.