Re: fork()

I vote subversion as well.

- Subversion is, for a lot of users, a lot easier to learn. It has
really well written documentation and provides several comparisons to
CVS. arch only seemed to get in the way of people. It's really a great
piece of software, but it seemed to disenchant a lot of people.
- Y-windows is going to have little need for a distributed repository.
There will be a few people working on it a lot (direct commit
privileges) and possibly a lot of people doing tiny bugfixes, which
can be made into patches and then submitted. Anyone who needs to do
any branching/merging or moving of files will probably have direct
commit access to the repository, so there is no need for arch's
patches that handle changes to directories.
- For what I've used subversion for it seems to fit the bill for the
Y-Windows project.

There's my two cents.

-jh

On 1/7/06, Harrison Caudill <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1/6/06, Kristian Mueller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > But I have to admit, that I have not tryed it in person - though I am
> > planing to.
>
> Considering the number of people involved in this, and the magnitude
> of our undertaking, I recommend we limit our experimentation to
> graphics, not source control.
>
> I vote subversion.
>
> Harrison
>
> --
> Harrison Caudill BS BS               |  .^        www.hypersphere.org
> Computer Science & Physics Graduate  |  | Me*Me=3D1
> Georgia Institute of Technology      | v'         I'm just a normal guy
>


--
James Harr <[email protected]>