Re: fork()
Simon Persson <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:15:09 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.graphics.y.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--nextPart1582244.QuBxnXXeHT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 31 January 2006 20:50, Eric Sandall wrote: > <snip> > Instead of forking, why not just pick up the y-windows project as it > is and continue it with the community? This way you get to keep the > name, website, etc. Of course you'll want to contact Mark (and > possibly Andrew) about this and try to get their permission, but I see > you've already done that and gotten no response. In that case, I'd try > to keep this community going with this name instead of forking. If > Mark (the legal owner of y-windows, AFAIK) comes by and says, "Hey, I > own this name and I don't want you using it." then we can just grab > our code we've done and rename the project. > > -sandalle I agree. Also, a common vision is needed. There's still a few big decisions to be ma= de.=20 Innovation is important. Serverside widgets are good but it's not enough to= =20 motivate all the work needed to make Y usable. Building the whole thing on= =20 opengl using cairo/glitz would be a good thing imho. But that brings in a=20 whole bunch of new decisions to be made: allowing for resolution=20 independence, 3d desktop, egl vs. miniglx and such things. I feel I don't have enough experience to make such big decisions and I won'= t=20 start writing code until there's a clear plan for the project. //Simon --nextPart1582244.QuBxnXXeHT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD39NjCCGZdRKJl68RAoyOAJ4pUbrp8n1nkxy0m385roEoUVf8cwCfTPhW c6HDZImDJNX5cH5RD4FdBzE= =W421 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1582244.QuBxnXXeHT--