Re: fork()

On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Richard Hills wrote:

> On Wed February 1 2006 00:05, David McBride wrote:
>> <mode style=blunt>
>>
>> No-one, despite all { ... bluntness ... } no-one's going to pay you any
> attention.
>
> 	Agreed entirely. To try and motivate some development, I suggest:
>
[..]

I'm suprised this mailing list still works. The original Y might as well
be dead. Some thoughts as to why:

   The original concept was good. Well thought out.
   But:
     1. No or bad management.
        the Linux kernal is succesful because there is a manager that
        does a good job doing management.

     2. Bad attitude.
        not likely to hold down a job of any importance.

     3. Original code with a gazillion patches.
        what works?  what don't?  enough to discourage a newcomer from
        joining the ranks.

I wish you luck.
   Russ