Re: sizeof (c) vs sizeof (*c)

Hi,

Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> Well *if* the second is correct, I don't see why you'd prefer the
> first as it is saying something very different.
> 
> sizeof (c) is here the size of a pointer so even if it happens that
> sizeof (struct gpe_pim_category) is the size of a pointer, the code is
> wrong.  The programmer likely intended to write sizeof (*c).

then the second one is really wrong... could have been some uncommon C notation
it happens frm time to time that you discover somethign new in y language you
thought you knew ;)

Greetings

Florian

-- 
The dream of yesterday                  Florian Boor
is the hope of today                    Tel: +49 271-771091-14
and the reality of tomorrow.            Fax: +49 271-771091-19
[Robert Hutchings Goddard, 1904]        [email protected]

1D78 2D4D 6C53 1CA4 5588  D07B A8E7 940C 25B7 9A76