GPE bugtracker and SCM
Florian Boor <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:42:55 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.gpe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, now that Paul asked - what do you guys think about the technical aspects? I'm personally not adverse to SVN, it would make some things we face with the GPE tree much easier - e.g. we could sort the modules more easily. Currently more or less everything is in the base subdir. Subversion should be quite stable and is quite similar to CVS from the users point of view. But i'd like to have some more opinions about this - are there important reasons not to use SVN? A similar situation we have with the bugtracker, something we should have set up quite some time ago. We have several choices - all with advantages and disadvantages. - Bugzilla: Well known to developers and users. It would allow to trade bugs from distributions to upstream development. - GForge bugtracker: Good integration with GForge but just another tracker people need to learn to use. - Trac or CVSTrac bugtracker: Good integration with SCM and quite easy to use. I suppose we have some opinions :-) Greetings Florian -- The dream of yesterday Florian Boor is the hope of today Tel: 0271-7411487 and the reality of tomorrow. [email protected] [Robert Hutchings Goddard, 1904] [email protected] 1D78 2D4D 6C53 1CA4 5588 D07B A8E7 940C 25B7 9A76