RE: FW: Gpe on GTK-DirectFB

Hello!

Thanx for your response. We saw the gtkperf statistics with 2.10/2.6 and we
are considering 2.6 on DirectFB as it is fast. So, can any of you tell how
much effort it takes to port GPE applications like calendar and PIM
applications onto GTK 2.6 -Directfb.

What kind of issues can come up for this.

Thanx in advance.
Raju

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of falls huang
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 4:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FW: [Gpe] Gpe on GTK-DirectFB

Hello!

   I think there is no need to run GPE on gtk+ 2.10 directfb :

1. gtk+2.10 is more slower than gtk+2.6 , you can use GtkPerf to test
the speed of 2.10/2.6.
(http://mail.gnome.org/archives/performance-list/2006-July/msg00084.html)

2. According to my experience , gtk-x11 need about 4M sdram more than
gtk-directfb, most of the linux based smartphones/pdas have 64M sdram
, it enough for gtk-x11 --- I think so.

3. gtk-directfb is more immaturer than gtk-x11

4. gtk+-2.10-directfb need cairo-directfb , and cairo-directfb is not
mature for a product.

btw: ??????gtk+??

2006/9/21, Raju S N <[email protected]>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> How much effort it takes to port GPE applications like calendar and PIM
> applications onto GTK-Directfb 2.10 version. Did anyone of you tried
> this before ? What kind of issues can come up for this.
>
> Please share the details.
>
> Thanx
> Raju S N
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GPE mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/gpe
>


--
Regards
Falls Huang