RE: [SUMMARY] Intimate on microdrive with 0.5-pre Fami liar
"Munson, Jason (MED)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.linux.intimate |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2DE78F33FFE0D3118C0200508B94F9CA098C34E5__26836.0876515091$1115030458$gmane$org@uswaumsx08medge.med.ge.com> |
I need to verify this, I was under the ASSumption that the Intimate installer would have inserted that module, but now I see that that might not be the case. I'll try it tonight and post results tomorrow, along with interim documentation if it works. Thanks, everyone! Jason -----Original Message----- From: Hietaniemi Jarkko (NRC/Boston) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 5:29 PM To: Munson, Jason (MED); [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Intimate] [SUMMARY] Intimate on microdrive with 0.5-pre Fami liar > Anybody else have problems with this procedure and a 340 MB Microdrive? > My install, after following the instructions, ended up running out of > space on a 3670. Are you *certain* that your microdrive got mounted? I remember seeing problems not unlike this when the mounting failed for some reason or another? (like the reiserfs modules being somehow bungled, nowadays I explicitly ipkg install reiserfs-module ipkg install reiserfs-modules-2.4.7-modules-rmk3-np1-devfs before even running the beta-installer) If the microdrive isn't mounted, the rsync will obviously run aground pretty quickly... the installation *should* fit even on an 340MB microdrive: I have "Used" of only 145880 kB. > After dropping back to a command line, I had only 128K free in > the root FS. What does 'df' show? Is the /dev/hda1 really mounted?