Re: Re: Re [iPAQ] Running initimate under familiar.

> No idea - maybe it needs to mail errors or logs? could make a dummy "I'm
> an MTA" package.

In fact, thttpd depends on logrotate, which depends on mailx, which
depends on mail-transport-agent.  If you had one supplying that
virtual package (even the microscopic "ssmtp") you'd have been fine;
exim just turns out to be the debian-wide default, installing ssmtp
instead would have satisfied it.

> The current debian "one patch for the whole packaging" thing is
> sometimes a pain. There are some debian tools which can manage multiple

At the same time, note that those patches *should* have already gone
upstream, so finding them on the relevant upstream developers list
would have probably been faster.