Re: CF 512M vs. CF 2G
"Kristoffer Ericson" <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:34:53 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.linux.jornada |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Greetings, For 6xx we've experienced some issues with >= 1GB cards from kingston. Currently no idea why. Either filip or me will get to this bug later as its important to fix. Would be interesting to try a newer kernel just to make sure it still exists (which it really should). I will most likely have some new builds up with minor userland later today. Best wishes Kristoffer >From: Adam Pribyl <[email protected]> >CC: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [jornada] CF 512M vs. CF 2G >Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:15:43 +0100 (CET) > >On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Filip Zyzniewski wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Remember that with 2.6 kernels you don't need an initrd, but you should >>use the rootdelay option. params.txt should look like this: >> >> >>======================================================= >>\Storage Card\kernel >> >>root=/dev/hda2 rootdelay=1 >>======================================================= >> >>Sometimes the kernel just wants to mount rootfs before recognizing >>cards. rootdelay=1 option prevents that by forcing it to wait for a >>second :). Have fun :). > >I would like to report success, but I can not. I tried even longer delay, >but I still end up with kernel panic, unable to mount rootfs. > >>bye, >>Filip > >I noticed few differences between card behaviour. Quiestion is, if that is >only size dependent, or supplier/producer dependent. > >Adam Pribyl >_______________________________________________ >jornada mailing list >[email protected] >https://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/jornada _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/