Re: Re: [Opie-cvs] opie/library locationcombo.cpp, 1.1 locationcombo.h, 1.1 global.cpp, 1.29 global.h, 1.4 library.pro, 1.37 qlibrary_unix.cpp, 1.8 timestring.cpp, 1.8 timestring.h, 1.6
Lorn Potter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.opie.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Thanks for adding camera2, but I'm _very_ uneasy about that part of the > commit. > > 1.) the commit message makes no sense, this is /library, what has it to > do with video4linux? > 2.) you just toss random stuff into _the_ core library of Opie without > giving us a chance to review. not at all random, but trying to get libqpe up to date and more compatible with Qtopia. > 3.) you change the API and ABI of a stable library without giving us a > chance to review. > > Opie development may be effectively dead, Then why does it matter to you and why bring this up, if you or everyone else is not interested in developing Opie? I am, and I am going to proceed with changes I see fit, otherwise I will simply start my own project, and make changes there as I see fit. You don't have to agree with my changes, I certainly do not agree with all the changes everyone has made, but I did not cause a stink because whoever developer wanted them in. but we have to defend the > quality of a stable tree, so I would recommend reverting these changes > until we can get over them one by one. > When have I ever been included with any review of any changes? or for that matter, when has there ever been ANY discussions/review, except maybe perhaps in #opie.de. When has HEAD _ever_ been known as the stable tree on any project? _______________________________________________ http://opie.handhelds.org/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/DeveloperWikiIndex Opie-devel mailing list [email protected] https://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/opie-devel