Re: Opie in Angstrom
"Paul Eggleton" <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:40:09 +1300 (NZDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.opie.devel,gmane.linux.distributions.angstrom.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > 1. There's an unpleasant bug uncovered itself in 1.2.3 release - on > some device models (e.g., h3900, h4000, some Palm models but not hx4700= ) > after start the screen is rotated 90 degrees. This used to work in > prereleases, so current suspect is h2200 rotation patch which was > committed shortly before release. It could be that it regressed > rotation handling for other models. Argh :( The patch I committed shortly before release actually rips out the change I made that caused unexpected rotation of the screen (which should have been h2200-specific anyway) and instead just changes the way that the cursor keys are interpreted, again for h2200 only. For reference, here's the diff: http://handhelds.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/opie/libopie2/opiecore/device/ode= vice_ipaq.cpp.diff?r1=3D1.31&r2=3D1.32&f=3Dh Now, it's possible that some of the other changes we made to odevice* caused this to happen. In any case, something must be wrong here, and I'm not suggesting that I'm definitely not to blame for this :) I'm pretty sure you can add h2200 to the list of devices that are not affected by this issue. Interesting that you mention h3900 - is that device in a state where it can happily run Opie using the 2.6 kernel? I have not tried that for some time, perhaps I should. > This is top priority issue to be fixed, IMHO. Agreed. Unfortunately this is the first time I've heard about this problem. I don't know how Erik feels but I am happy to fast-track 1.2.4 a little bit if we are able to solve this problem soon. Alternatively I would be fine with patching 1.2.3 in OE and also solving it for 1.2.4 whe= n it comes out, too, whatever works best. > Note that it's not in the tracker. Since you mention you don't have permanent net access I have now filed on= e on the Opie side for this: http://opie-bugs.oszine.de/view.php?id=3D1894 > Point 2 is crucial to get support in Angstrom - let me remind, that > per Angstrom policies, Angstrom maintainers don't do build engineering > themselves - device mentors do, so many people doing regular builds > and maintaining them what "supported" means. Right. However, if there are genuine bugs preventing Opie from being supported I would like to hear about them so I can help solve them. I guess I also need to get up to speed on Angstrom policies so that I can contribute more directly (I hope they are well documented somewhere). Cheers, Paul _______________________________________________ http://opie.handhelds.org/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/DeveloperWikiIndex Opie-devel mailing list [email protected] https://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/opie-devel