Re: Opie in Angstrom
Mike Norton <xsideofparadise-/[email protected]> Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.distributions.angstrom.devel,gmane.comp.handhelds.opie.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
How many angstroms are emitted from a hydrogen atom when conceiving a photon? Paul Eggleton wrote: > Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >> 1. There's an unpleasant bug uncovered itself in 1.2.3 release - on >> some device models (e.g., h3900, h4000, some Palm models but not hx4700) >> after start the screen is rotated 90 degrees. This used to work in >> prereleases, so current suspect is h2200 rotation patch which was >> committed shortly before release. It could be that it regressed >> rotation handling for other models. > Argh :( > The patch I committed shortly before release actually rips out the change > I made that caused unexpected rotation of the screen (which should have > been h2200-specific anyway) and instead just changes the way that the > cursor keys are interpreted, again for h2200 only. For reference, here's > the diff: > http://handhelds.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/opie/libopie2/opiecore/device/odevice_ipaq.cpp.diff?r1=1.31&r2=1.32&f=h > Now, it's possible that some of the other changes we made to odevice* > caused this to happen. In any case, something must be wrong here, and I'm > not suggesting that I'm definitely not to blame for this :) > I'm pretty sure you can add h2200 to the list of devices that are not > affected by this issue. Interesting that you mention h3900 - is that > device in a state where it can happily run Opie using the 2.6 kernel? I > have not tried that for some time, perhaps I should. >> This is top priority issue to be fixed, IMHO. > Agreed. Unfortunately this is the first time I've heard about this > problem. I don't know how Erik feels but I am happy to fast-track 1.2.4 a > little bit if we are able to solve this problem soon. Alternatively I > would be fine with patching 1.2.3 in OE and also solving it for 1.2.4 when > it comes out, too, whatever works best. >> Note that it's not in the tracker. > Since you mention you don't have permanent net access I have now filed one > on the Opie side for this: > http://opie-bugs.oszine.de/view.php?id=1894 >> Point 2 is crucial to get support in Angstrom - let me remind, that >> per Angstrom policies, Angstrom maintainers don't do build engineering >> themselves - device mentors do, so many people doing regular builds >> and maintaining them what "supported" means. > Right. However, if there are genuine bugs preventing Opie from being > supported I would like to hear about them so I can help solve them. I > guess I also need to get up to speed on Angstrom policies so that I can > contribute more directly (I hope they are well documented somewhere). > Cheers, > Paul > _______________________________________________ > Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list > Angstrom-distro-devel-CQP9ExgZy9rrZ44/[email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com