Re:Any experience with Palm Pre or Pixi plus? (at&t)
Justin Moon <mooneroid-/[email protected]> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:37:58 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.palm.gtd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have a Pixi Plus on Verizon. I would advise against any Pixi. I love webOS,
but the Pixi and Pixi plus are far too underpowered to provide a decent
experience. The Pre Plus (offered on AT&T and previously on Verizon) is much
better. I've read complaints about the build quality, but not the computer
guts. The phone is plastic, and people say the charging port door is flimsy,
and the front bezel cracks around the charging port. There are other issues
too, but those are the most common I've heard. The internals of the phone have
plenty of beef to run whatever apps you desire.
Having said all that, HP has announced more powerful phones that will be coming
out this summer (no specific date, which is another source of community ire).
As Anthony said, have a look at those before deciding what to do. I'm not one
to chase the latest and greatest hardware (budgetary concerns), but it may be
worth waiting. Also, Verizon is currently offering the Pre 2, which is a decent
incremental improvement over the Pre Plus. HP offers it in a GSM unlocked
version that would be compatible with AT&T. If you needed something in the near
future, I'd recommend that over anything else.
My Pixi Plus is keeping me going, but I'm cursing that I decided to go with free
instead of ponying up a little cash for the Pre Plus.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]