Re: [HS] Suggestion for HS
db <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.handhelds.palm.handyshopper |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I also am in the camp that finds I am frequently having to chase down the item I was working on to finish the edit ... usually I have created a new item or edited an item because I want to assign "need" to it for an upcoming shop and zip! ... it's gone from view and I have to scroll to find it to finish the process. I encounter it a lot and it's probably my only complaint with the whole fantastic program. db chrisant_wa wrote: > This has been discussed a few times in the past. > > It depends entirely on what you're doing: > > If you're interacting with a specific item, and you plan to continue interacting with the specific item, then it would make sense to keep it visible. > > If you're interacting with the list, e.g. moving various items, then it would make sense to keep the view where it was. > > Either way the app chooses, it will sometimes be "wrong". > > > --- In [email protected], James Shattuck <progman@...> wrote: > >> Yes, I've noticed the same thing, the list focus transfers to what was adjacent >> to the item that was changed, instead of staying with the item in its new >> location. >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Dwight C. Carr <carrdwight@...> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Tue, September 7, 2010 4:23:28 PM >> Subject: [HS] Suggestion for HS >> >> >> I had been meaning to post this for a long time. Recent posts about future HS >> versions prompted me to post this. I would suggest that when editing an item in >> >> HS that causes the database sorting to change, the focus should remain on the >> item that is being edited. As is now, if I change an item and the sort changes, >> >> I have to look through the data base to find the item and continue editing. >> >> >> Hope this suggestion is useful. >> >> Best Regards, >> Dwight... >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]