Re: Open Source was Re: New to the list

"Thomas Levine" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.altkeyboards
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Or, even better, free software

On 2/9/07, Keith Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>    you've taken the step up to the Dvorak keyboard, now it is time to go
> all
>
> the way and switch to open source software...Linux, BsD etc. the
> difference is about the same as Qwerty vs Dvorak.
>
> Bob
>
> ---------
>
> I periodically go back and try them out. I'd hardly say the difference is
> similar.
>
> While I would like the initiative to succeed, I wont be an active
> supporter
> until some large items get addressed.
>
> First, installation of software is horrid. Even dealing with Mandake type
> installers - or even better - the Ubuntu software library - feels
> sometimes
> like I have to have a PHD in Linux software. Then, when something goes
> wrong, it's a nightmare to figure out why and how to fix it. Some fixes
> even
> go as far as to give instructions like "edit the source and modify the
> hardware properties of XYZ".
>
> Yuck.
>
> Or, the classic -
> Go to install package A
> "You need Package B"
> Google package B
> Find it (maybe)
> Install B
> "You need package C and D"
> etc...
>
> I've spent entire evenings just trying to install software.
>
> Yuck.
>
> And then, it gets even better! I run my AIM program (GAIM at the time) and
> then start up my music player.
> "Cannot access the sound device because another application has locked the
> device"
> OK fine, disable sound in GAIM. Now, I get my tunes going...
> Open a game - "Cannot access the sound device because another application
> has locked it"
>
> So, I go searching for fixes. There is a Unified Linux Sound Architecture
> (or something like that) and guess what? To use it, I have to edit and
> recompile each application I want to give access to it at the same time.
>
> ---
>
> Now, don't get me wrong, I really do think that having an open source O/S
> is
> a big win for consumers, but that O/S has to come a long way until I adopt
> it. The ability to use my existing programs will be big amongst that
> requirement as well. And WINE, LINDOWS and XWindows are still too buggy.
>
> So, at the end of January, I gave MS another 250$ for their O/S.
>
> Because it works.
>
> --Keith
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.