Re: Open Source was Re: New to the list
"Thomas Levine" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.altkeyboards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Or, even better, free software On 2/9/07, Keith Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote: > > you've taken the step up to the Dvorak keyboard, now it is time to go > all > > the way and switch to open source software...Linux, BsD etc. the > difference is about the same as Qwerty vs Dvorak. > > Bob > > --------- > > I periodically go back and try them out. I'd hardly say the difference is > similar. > > While I would like the initiative to succeed, I wont be an active > supporter > until some large items get addressed. > > First, installation of software is horrid. Even dealing with Mandake type > installers - or even better - the Ubuntu software library - feels > sometimes > like I have to have a PHD in Linux software. Then, when something goes > wrong, it's a nightmare to figure out why and how to fix it. Some fixes > even > go as far as to give instructions like "edit the source and modify the > hardware properties of XYZ". > > Yuck. > > Or, the classic - > Go to install package A > "You need Package B" > Google package B > Find it (maybe) > Install B > "You need package C and D" > etc... > > I've spent entire evenings just trying to install software. > > Yuck. > > And then, it gets even better! I run my AIM program (GAIM at the time) and > then start up my music player. > "Cannot access the sound device because another application has locked the > device" > OK fine, disable sound in GAIM. Now, I get my tunes going... > Open a game - "Cannot access the sound device because another application > has locked it" > > So, I go searching for fixes. There is a Unified Linux Sound Architecture > (or something like that) and guess what? To use it, I have to edit and > recompile each application I want to give access to it at the same time. > > --- > > Now, don't get me wrong, I really do think that having an open source O/S > is > a big win for consumers, but that O/S has to come a long way until I adopt > it. The ability to use my existing programs will be big amongst that > requirement as well. And WINE, LINDOWS and XWindows are still too buggy. > > So, at the end of January, I gave MS another 250$ for their O/S. > > Because it works. > > --Keith > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]