Re: Staggered or not ???
"Chuck Esterbrook" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.altkeyboards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I can say that I've used both, and the columnar layout is more comfortable for me. This would really be your ultimate test--try it. I believe both the TypeMatrix and the Kinesis Contour (I've only used the former) require less finger movement than a staggered keyboard. I'm sure the original staggering was due to the levers on mechanical keyboards and never came out of any ergonomics decision. Also, I find the idea that staggering lets you reach multiple letters--implying that columnar does not--to be laughable. I reach multiple letters on a columnar layout, too! -Chuck On 3/14/07, Yatin Sethi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have always been reading on the staggered and columnar layouts but haven't > got any better clarity. > There are discussions to support both the viewpoints. Few quotes: > > In favor of Staggered layout: > "The stagger is important in that you can reach multiple letters with the > same finger. Moving those letters directly under a finger reduces > efficiency." > > If the staggering of keys are supposed to have some benefit to your finger > movements, why is it then that the whole keyboard is staggered the same way? > Doesn't it stand to reason that one side should be staggered the other way? > After all, we don't have two right hands... > > Against Staggered layout: > "Today's keyboards descend in a straight line from yesterday's mechanical > typewriters. The reason the keys are staggered is because it gives the > typewriter engineers more space to place their levers. It too was > specifically designed to avoid the collision of the levers." > > "The staggered key arrangement is a bad thing because it forces your fingers > to do a lot of diagonal reaching. When you strike the key down your finger > is thus in a particularly vulnerable position and at a mechanical > disadvantage resulting in more strain than is necessary." > > My only confusion that still prevails: > Which one is better: staggered or non-staggered .. and WHY ?? > > We do see many new keyboards coming up with non-staggered layouts > (Typematrix 2030) and many other which are still following the staggered > layout. Any suggestions guys ?? > > > Regards' > > Yatin. > > > -- > Yatin Sethi > www.yatinsethi.com > > > > > On 3/14/07, Chuck Esterbrook <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Pretty cool stuff, but too bad the Apple keyboards are still staggered > > instead of columnar... > > > > > > On 3/13/07, nkmcalli <[email protected] <nkmcalli%40yahoo.com>> wrote: > > > Some follow-up about dvorak laptops. Check out these pix on Flickr. > > > It's step by step photos of a person moving the keys on their Apple > > > MacBook. > > > > > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/69631394@N00/tags/keyboard/ > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > To Post a message, send it to: [email protected] > To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [email protected] > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >