Re: Staggered or not ???
Marcus Brooks <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.altkeyboards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'll accept your Shenanigans if your wrists are parallel to each other when you type; that is, if you sit with your elbows together. I can't do that, it makes my shoulders hurt. I'm rather wide, so my wrists lie at roughly a 45 degree angle to each other when I type. For me, a columnar layout would only work if it was split at a 45 degree angle in the middle. Otherwise columns make me do _more_ of that "horizontal jumping" (relative to my fingers) that you dislike so much. Marcus On Mar 14, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Keith Ratliff wrote: > "The stagger is important in that you can reach multiple letters > with the > same finger. Moving those letters directly under a finger reduces > efficiency." > > I'm calling Shenanigans. > > 1) In a "box" (columnar) formation, a finger has 9 keys next to it. > In a > staggered, a finger has 7 keys next to it. > 2) Proper typing skills teach that you shouldn't be jumping > horizontal rows > anyway. > > --Keith > > On 3/14/07, Yatin Sethi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I have always been reading on the staggered and columnar layouts but >> haven't >> got any better clarity. >> There are discussions to support both the viewpoints. Few quotes: >> >> In favor of Staggered layout: >> "The stagger is important in that you can reach multiple letters >> with the >> same finger. Moving those letters directly under a finger reduces >> efficiency." >> >> If the staggering of keys are supposed to have some benefit to >> your finger >> movements, why is it then that the whole keyboard is staggered the >> same >> way? >> Doesn't it stand to reason that one side should be staggered the >> other >> way? >> After all, we don't have two right hands... >> >> Against Staggered layout: >> "Today's keyboards descend in a straight line from yesterday's >> mechanical >> typewriters. The reason the keys are staggered is because it gives >> the >> typewriter engineers more space to place their levers. It too was >> specifically designed to avoid the collision of the levers." >> >> "The staggered key arrangement is a bad thing because it forces your >> fingers >> to do a lot of diagonal reaching. When you strike the key down >> your finger >> is thus in a particularly vulnerable position and at a mechanical >> disadvantage resulting in more strain than is necessary." >> >> My only confusion that still prevails: >> Which one is better: staggered or non-staggered .. and WHY ?? >> >> We do see many new keyboards coming up with non-staggered layouts >> (Typematrix 2030) and many other which are still following the >> staggered >> layout. Any suggestions guys ?? >> >> Regards' >> >> Yatin. >> >> -- >> Yatin Sethi >> www.yatinsethi.com >> >> On 3/14/07, Chuck Esterbrook >> <[email protected]<Chuck.Esterbrook%40gmail.com>> >> wrote: >>> >>> Pretty cool stuff, but too bad the Apple keyboards are still >>> staggered >>> instead of columnar... >>> >> >> On 3/13/07, nkmcalli <[email protected] <nkmcalli% >> 40yahoo.com><nkmcalli%40yahoo.com>> wrote: >>>> Some follow-up about dvorak laptops. Check out these pix on Flickr. >>>> It's step by step photos of a person moving the keys on their Apple >>>> MacBook. >>>> >>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/69631394@N00/tags/keyboard/ >>>> >>> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -------------------- > ~--> > Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. > http://us.click.yahoo.com/4It09A/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/09ewlB/TM > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > ~-> > > To Post a message, send it to: [email protected] > To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: altkeyboards- > [email protected] > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >