Re: Keyboards with keycaps which are the same shape
"zootle" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.altkeyboards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've tried one 'ultra-slim' keyboard; it couldn't be converted because (at least) one of the mountings for one of the keys that needed to be relocated was (for some odd reason) a different type of mounting to the others :( --- In [email protected], Thomas Levine <thomas.levine@...> wrote: > > I must say that I would never buy such a keyboard. Anyway, you could use > laptop-style keyboards, a few of which are available at Newegg. They'll > still have the bumps on the QWERTY F and J keys though. > > Thomas Levine! > > > > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 16:00 +0000, zootle wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I'm new to this list, apologies if there's already a discussion about > > this topic (if there is, could you point me to it, please?). > > > > I'm trying to source keyboards that have keycaps all the same shape, > > for conversion, primarily to Dvorak (I've started recently to sell > > these, with some small success so far) but obviously such keyboards > > will be of interest to anyone who wishes to try an alternative layout. > > > > I have so far found just three keyboards that are reasonably priced > > and fit the bill. These are, in order of my personal preference of > > quality: > > > > 1. Logitech Y-SU61 Deluxe > > 2. Tesco 'Value' keyboard > > 3. Colorsit KB-1807 > > > > (#1 and #3 are available through my 'Broadband for your Fingers' > > eBid.net store at http://uk.four.ebid.net/perl/main.cgi?mo=user- > > store&title=Broadband-for-your-Fingers - the Tesco one costs just > > £4.45 from - surprisingly - Tescos). > > > > These are all PS/2 models (which possibly explains why such keyboards > > have become so inexpensive in recent months?). I have been trying to > > find some USB equivalents, even though these are likely to be more > > costly. > > > > Does anyone here know of any such keyboards, PS/2 or USB? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >