Re: Dvorak logo?
"Chuck Esterbrook" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.altkeyboards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hey, not bad! "Typed with Dvorak" would read a little snappier. -Chuck On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Keith Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote: > That's because I'm a retard and sent an attachment to a listserv. > > Here, I uploaded it to my personal site: > http://keithratliff.com/dvorak/dvoraklogo.png > > --Keith > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Chuck Esterbrook > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The message says: >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> even when I view the message via the Yahoo Groups page. >> >> -Chuck >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Keith Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I don't have Photoshop on the computer I'm on, but with free tools, >>> here's a first take. >>> >>> Probably tomorrow I'll fix it up with Photoshop (this one lack the >>> polish I'd usually go for). >>> >>> I will also make one of those super small ones. >>> >>> --Keith >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Giles Orr <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> 2008/10/21 Chuck Esterbrook <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Is there a nice Dvorak logo one can put on their personal web site or >>>>> blog? >>>> >>>> I'm not aware of any logo - doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but it >>>> obviously hasn't made a significant impression. Keith, I at least >>>> would be interested in seeing your shot at it. Technically I'm also a >>>> web monkey (for now), but my artistic talents are approximately nil. >>>> And encompassing what the Dvorak keyboard is and/or does in a single >>>> button will be difficult. >>>> >>>>> And if so, what's the best Dvorak URL to link to? >>>> >>>> One possibility: >>>> >>>> http://dvzine.org/ >>>> >>>> We haven't heard much from them in a while on this list, but the site >>>> indicates that they're doing stuff on their own time. I'm a big fan >>>> of the comic book they produced about why Dvorak it better: it's very >>>> readable, and makes the point really well without going all >>>> fundamentalist on anyone. >>>> >>>> Marcus Brooks's site (http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/) is possibly the >>>> most comprehensive, but I think it's a better landing point for those >>>> who are already converted. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Giles >>>> http://www.gilesorr.com/ >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>> >>> >> >> >