Re: "World's Weirdest Keyboards"
Thomas Levine <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.altkeyboards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alphabetical is not necessarily bad if it's only done as a secondary order. Look at the California case. But, yeah, it makes no sense. On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Giles Orr <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, alphabetical order makes no sense. Not to mention that it's got > three columns on one side and five on the other - its use of the hands > looks very unbalanced. > > But it comes in camo colour, so that's okay then. > > Oh wait, I said not to mock ... what a bind. > > 2009/4/7 Keith Ratliff <[email protected] <dracorat%40gmail.com>>: > > > ... the keys are in alphabetical order. > > > > That's horrid. > > > > --Keith > > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Chuck Esterbrook < > [email protected] <Chuck.Esterbrook%40gmail.com> > >> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Giles Orr > >> <[email protected] <gilesorr%40gmail.com><gilesorr%40gmail.com>> > > > >> wrote: > >> > http://tech.msn.com/products/slideshow.aspx?cp-documentid=18656473 > >> ... > >> > >> Thanks for the post. I thought this one looked interesting: > >> > >> http://abkey.biz/ > >> > >> Anyone here try it yet? > >> > >> > That led me to this: > >> > > >> > > http://www.cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk/G844100+Compact+Series-Details.htm > >> > >> TypeMatrix has a nice entry in this area, if you don't like your keys > >> staggered: > >> > >> http://typematrix.com/ > > -- > Giles > http://www.gilesorr.com/ > [email protected] <gilesorr%40gmail.com> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]