Re: If you know about the Maltron - Promoting Dvorak could be a sin.
Chuck Esterbrook <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:15:42 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.altkeyboards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Well first, thanks for bringing up an interesting topic. But I had trouble sifting through your web site so here are some convenient links for our readers on the subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maltron_keyboard http://maltron.com/ http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=maltron http://www.google.com/search?q=maltron I had looked at the Maltron before, but at the time it was expensive and not available in the U.S. (except as an import). I wasn't sure if I would like it or how easy it would be to return if I didn't. ... It appears that much has not changed. I'm not as negative as you are on the Dvorak layout. It substantially reduces finger motion, takes advantage of "drumming" and reduces strain. That's all great stuff! Yes, Mr. Dvorak fell short of changing the physical keyboard. He still made a nice contribution, as did Kroemer. In your own words, the Maltrons are "damn expensive" and possible not available in the U.S. And it sounds like you haven't tried one yet (neither have I). So doesn't it make sense to recommend TypeMatrix/Dvorak and Kinesis/Dvorak in the mean time? -Chuck -- http://chuckesterbrook.com/