Re: What to use? EtherCAT or Ethernet Powerlink with CANopen protocol
Steinhoff <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.bus.can |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Albert Saenz wrote: > Hi all, > I want to thanks everybodybut, I'm sorry, I think my question was not > clearly introduce. > 1. Despite any PLC can NOT be deterministic because it depends on the > "branch" it executes the program (Soft Real Time). It dependes on the type of the "PLC" ... a can be SoftPLC be deterministic if it works eventoriented on top of an RTOS. For instance: http://dachs.net/DACHSview++_E_fleyer.pdf [ clip] >Anyhow, our query was to demand your opinions when we need to control more >axis and all the I/Os (digital and analog) with a single field bus channel? >That is because we are thinking in EtherCat or Powerlink (despite that I >sincerely believe that Ethernet hardware will win to any other solution in >the CNC market). You should also have a look to the VARAN bus: http://www.varan-bus.net/index_en.htm Best Regards --Armin > Hope I have clarify properly >Best, >Albert Saenz >Skype: my_voip