Re: What to use? EtherCAT or Ethernet Powerlink with CANopen protocol
Steinhoff <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.bus.can |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bertil Bäck wrote: > Hi, > just thought that I would also link the following site: > https://www.osadl.org/Real-time-Ethernet-Ethercat-worst-case.qa-farm-rt-ethernet-recording.0.html > Works with the minimal size of Ethernet packets ... 2 bits (1byte) of user data :-) -> this seems to be the smallest possible duration of the bus cycle ! The packet size is the critical point of the round-trip time ... Regards --Armin > > It has some performance monitoring on both Ethercat and Powerlink. The > setups are not quite similar so the numbers are not that easy to compare > > Br, > Bertil > > Bertil BÄCK R&D Manager Hardware > T +358 6 357 6305, M +358 50 588 6895, F +358 6 357 6320 > [email protected], www.tke.fi - www.canopen.fi > > > > > -- > Archives and useful links: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CANbus > Subscribe and unsubscribe at www.vector.com/canlist/ > Report any problems to <[email protected]> > -- Archives and useful links: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CANbus Subscribe and unsubscribe at www.vector.com/canlist/ Report any problems to <[email protected]>