Re: How CAN FD reduces the probability of undetected errors

Heinz-Jürgen Oertel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.bus.can
Organization privat
Message-ID <1586129.fHOVCuezZb@heinz>
Am Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014, 07:57:46 schrieb Stephen Glow:
> On the subject of CAN-FD, does anyone know the current status of the ISO 
> standardization work?
> 
> Back in September I received word that some problems had been found with 
> the robustness of the CRC mechanism used in CAN-FD, and that there would 
> likely be a change to the CRC mechanism before final release.  I haven't 
> heard anything since then and haven't been able to find much in the way 
> of updates through web searches.
> 
> Is there a CAN-FD mailing list, or web site somewhere with updates on 
> the standardization process?
> 

Stephen,
The paper 
http://v2.can-newsletter.org/uploads/media/raw/64535617270a1a64abf2b581d0b9aaa9.pdf
describes the background and the solution.
If you like to get more info, ask at CiA [email protected]

 Heinz

> 
> 
> 
> On 11/30/2014 11:01 AM, Heinz-Jürgen Oertel wrote:
> > Interested?
> >
> > You should read the CAN Newsletter article written by Holger Zeltwanger
> > "CAN FD: Improved residual error-rate"
> > http://v2.can-newsletter.org/uploads/media/raw/64535617270a1a64abf2b581d0b9aaa9.pdf
> 
> --
> Archives and useful links: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CANbus
> Subscribe and unsubscribe at www.vector.com/canlist/
> Report any problems to <[email protected]>

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüßen
       Heinz-Jürgen Oertel
--
Archives and useful links: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CANbus
Subscribe and unsubscribe at www.vector.com/canlist/
Report any problems to <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.