2811 vs 2610 XM karsilastirmasi

Izledigim bir networkte iki uc lokasyonda eigrp nin convergence zamanlarini
gozlemliyorum.
EIGRP yi tekrar kurmaya calistigim zaman, ayný sayýda route 2610 in route
table ina daha hizli yazilirken 2811 daha gec converge ediyor.
20 saniyeye 40 saniye gibi bir fark olusuyor. CPU ve memory yuku olarak her
ikiside %5 in altýnda calisiyor. updatelerin alindigi hatlar gayet musait ve
config anlaminda farklilik yok
Bu yuzden 2811 da bu islemin daha hizli gerceklesmesini beklerdim. Bu farki
2610 kehine yaratan fark nedir bilgisi olan var mi?

Iyi calismalar

Taylan Esen


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--
Cisco Teknik Tartisma Listesi (Cisco-ttl)

Disclaimer: Some of the individuals posting to this site, including 
the moderators, work for Cisco Systems, Inc. Opinions expressed here and in any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original authors, not those of Cisco.
 Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cisco-ttl/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cisco-ttl/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/