Re: About Interrupt interval

Clifford Kelley <[email protected]> Thu, 22 May 2008 18:29:33 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.gps.opensource
Message-ID <5418846.1211506173679.JavaMail.root@elwamui-ovcar.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
The interrupt interval is set to about 500 microseconds.  The idea was to provide 2 checks per 1 ms of C/A code repeat time.  I have seen documentation with longer intervals but certainly no larger than 1 ms.

Cliff

-----Original Message-----
>From: ?? <[email protected]>
>Sent: May 21, 2008 8:49 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [OpenSource_GPS] About Interrupt interval
>
>Dear Sir,
> I wanna to know ,in the open software, how long is the Interrupt interval? And Why?
>
>Looking forward for your reply!
>
>Best Regards!
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:07 PM
>Subject: opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 7
>
>
>> Send opensource_gps mailing list submissions to
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of opensource_gps digest..."
>> 
>> 
>> Today's Topics:
>> 
>>   1. About Pream (??)
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 14:06:15 +0800
>> From: "??" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [OpenSource_GPS] About Pream
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Message-ID: <002e01c8bb08$cbf39590$7001a8c0@dlmu7657b7f615>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>> 
>> Dear Sir:
>> In the open software, the function Pream
>> 
>> when resync on the first subframe, TOW matches clock to 300 seconds; resync on the other subframes, TOW matches clock to 3 seconds.
>> 
>> I don't know why? why should be 3 seconds when resync on the other subframes? Is 300 seconds Ok?
>> 
>> Best Regards!
>> Looking forward for your letter!
>> 
>>                                                                    Yours
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 3:00 AM
>> Subject: opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 6
>> 
>> 
>>> Send opensource_gps mailing list submissions to
>>> [email protected]
>>> 
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> [email protected]
>>> 
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> [email protected]
>>> 
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of opensource_gps digest..."
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Today's Topics:
>>> 
>>>   1. Re: About Navigation Data overflow (Clifford Kelley)
>>>   2. Re: why tr_bit_time is different from 20ms epoch (Clifford Kelley)
>>>   3. the GPS1005 (yuguangzhan)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 19:04:59 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
>>> From: Clifford Kelley <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSource_GPS] About Navigation Data overflow
>>> To: ?? <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <25560991.1211249099509.JavaMail.root@elwamui-muscovy.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
>>> 
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>> 
>>> My recollection is that it is possible to get overflow when the end of a message frame is reached and during the time taken to decode the nav message means a few bits may overwrite the previous set.  With the data overflow array we won't miss this data and it can be used later without any problems.
>>> 
>>> Cliff
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>From: ?? <[email protected]>
>>>>Sent: May 15, 2008 7:24 PM
>>>>To: [email protected]
>>>>Subject: [OpenSource_GPS] About Navigation Data overflow
>>>>
>>>>Dear Sir:
>>>> 
>>>> I'm a graduate student. I'm very interested in OSGPS. I found in track program ,there is software dealing with data overflow, as following
>>>>
>>>>if ((ic->frame_ready) && (bitnum < 16)) {
>>>>      /* Overflow */
>>>>      if (c->bit)
>>>>        set_bit (ch, (void *) &data_overflow[bitnum]);
>>>>      else
>>>>        clear_bit (ch, (void *) &data_overflow[bitnum]);
>>>>    }
>>>>    else {
>>>>      if (c->bit)
>>>>        set_bit (ch, (void *) &data_mesg[bitnum]);
>>>>      else
>>>>        clear_bit (ch, (void *) &data_mesg[bitnum]);
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>>I think if there is data overflow, there will be error in navigation data. I wanna know is the condition of data overflow  exist?
>>>>
>>>>Best Regards!
>>>>
>>>>Looking forward for your reply!
>>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>From: <[email protected]>
>>>>To: <[email protected]>
>>>>Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 3:00 AM
>>>>Subject: opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Send opensource_gps mailing list submissions to
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>> than "Re: Contents of opensource_gps digest..."
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   1. Re: About pull_in state Parameter (??)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>> Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 17:58:40 +0800
>>>>> From: ?? <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSource_GPS] About pull_in state Parameter
>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>> Message-ID: <003501c8b672$4763d0f0$7001a8c0@dlmu7657b7f615>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I still wonder why we choose 45 deg as  the threshold ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> And I have another question. According to what ,you decide  the bandwide of the code loop and carrier loop? Did you do some simulation? Would you send me something  about the simulation?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looking forward for your reply.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> 
>>>>>                                                    Yours,
>>>>>                                                    Jiang Yi
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "Clifford Kelley" <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: "??" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:56 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSource_GPS] About pull_in state Parameter
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The threshold for power is set at the sqrt of 2 times the rms value.  To approximate this with integer values it was multiplied by 14 first and then divided by 10.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1200 was chosen as an approximate value of 45 deg based on the scaling used in the 4 quadrant arc tangent function.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I hope this helps,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cliff
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>From: ?? <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>Sent: May 8, 2008 7:41 PM
>>>>>>>To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>Subject: [OpenSource_GPS] About pull_in state Parameter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Dear Sir:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm a graduate student. I'm very interested in OSGPS. I wanna know the detail about OSGPS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In the end of pull_in state, the software use    if (c->avg > 14 * rms / 10  && c->th_rms < 12000  && c->ms_set) as the condition for track state.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>My problem :
>>>>>>>1   avg > 14 * rms / 10  ,what's the meaning  of 14 and 10
>>>>>>>2    c->th_rms < 12000   why should we choose 12000 as the the threshold
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Looking forward for your reply!
>>>>>>>Best Regard!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>>>From: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 3:00 AM
>>>>>>>Subject: opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Send opensource_gps mailing list submissions to
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>>>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>>>>> than "Re: Contents of opensource_gps digest..."
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   1. ???? ([email protected])
>>>>>>>>   2. Re: Why add 0.5 in pull_in and track parameter (??)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 12:00:42 -0700
>>>>>>>> From: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Subject: [OpenSource_GPS] ????
>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>>>>> URL: http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/pipermail/opensource_gps/attachments/20080507/78933d21/attachment.html 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Message: 2
>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 09:55:09 +0800
>>>>>>>> From: "??" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSource_GPS] Why add 0.5 in pull_in and track
>>>>>>>> parameter
>>>>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <000b01c8b0ae$8e56a420$7001a8c0@dlmu7657b7f615>
>>>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Dear Sir:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I found Open Source software is :
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> pull_carr_C1=(int) (1.69852*Bnpullcarr/Carrier_DCO_Delta/(4.0+5.333*Bnpullcarr/1000.0+(1.8856*Bnpullcarr/1000.0)*
>>>>>>>>  (1.8856*Bnpullcarr/1000.0))+0.5);
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> pull_carr_C2=(int) (0.6369183/Carrier_DCO_Delta*(1.8856*Bnpullcarr/1000.0)*(1.8856*Bnpullcarr/1000.0)*1000.0/
>>>>>>>>  (4.0+5.333*Bnpullcarr/1000.0+(1.8856*Bnpullcarr/1000.0)*(1.8856*Bnpullcarr/1000.0))+0.5);
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> pull_code_C1=(int) (10.598/Code_DCO_Delta*Bnpullcode/(4.0+5.333*Bnpullcode/1000.0+(1.8856*Bnpullcode/1000.0)*
>>>>>>>>  (1.8856*Bnpullcode/1000.0))+0.5);
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> pull_code_C2=(int) (4.028/Code_DCO_Delta*(1.8856*Bnpullcode/1000.0)*(1.8856*Bnpullcode/1000.0)*1000.0/
>>>>>>>>  (4.0+5.333*Bnpullcode/1000.0+(1.8856*Bnpullcode/1000.0)*(1.8856*Bnpullcode/1000.0))+0.5);
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I know C1 C2  is 
>>>>>>>> pull_carr_C1 = 1/(Ko*Kn)*8*zeta*On*Ts/(4+4*zeta*On*Ts+(On*Ts)^2);    
>>>>>>>> pull_carr_C2 = 1/(Ko*Kn)*4*(On*Ts)^2/(4+4*zeta*On*Ts+(On*Ts)^2); 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> By compared, I wonder why add 0.5 to C1 and C2
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>>>> From: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:00 AM
>>>>>>>> Subject: opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Send opensource_gps mailing list submissions to
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>>>>>> than "Re: Contents of opensource_gps digest..."
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>   1. osgps run under windows xp (yuguangzhan)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 12:05:10 +0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>>>> From: yuguangzhan <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> Subject: [OpenSource_GPS] osgps run under windows xp
>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi, Cliff:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I purchased a GPS1005  PCI bus board on year 2007 from GPS Creations. Now we 
>>>>>>>>> want to run it under windows xp.So we wonder if  the opensource_gps code can 
>>>>>>>>> run in windows xp and if there is a windows WDM driver available. 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Could you please advise how could I proceed in order to find
>>>>>>>>> such driver? Do you know anyone else who could have it available?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> yuguang.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> opensource_gps mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> End of opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 1
>>>>>>>>> *********************************************
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> opensource_gps mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> End of opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 2
>>>>>>>> *********************************************
>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>opensource_gps mailing list
>>>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>>>http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>>>
>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL: http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/pipermail/opensource_gps/attachments/20080515/532844ef/attachment.html 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> opensource_gps mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> End of opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 4
>>>>> *********************************************??i??'?????h??&
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>opensource_gps mailing list
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 19:10:37 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
>>> From: Clifford Kelley <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSource_GPS] why tr_bit_time is different from 20ms
>>> epoch
>>> To: ?? <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <1056535.1211249437681.JavaMail.root@elwamui-muscovy.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
>>> 
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>> 
>>> This is due to the bookkeeping of data bits which is handled in two places.  The chan[ch].meas_bit_time is the data bit into the week the measurement was made.  It is unambiguous but since it is on the user side of the interface it could be off by 1 bit.  The other value "bit" comes from the data bit counter in the GP2021 and is accurate but ambiguous since it only counts up to 50 data bits and then rolls over.  This part of the code resolves the ambiguity and corrects the meas_bit_time for later construction of the pseudorange.
>>> 
>>> Cliff
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>From: ?? <[email protected]>
>>>>Sent: May 16, 2008 3:02 AM
>>>>To: [email protected]
>>>>Subject: [OpenSource_GPS] why tr_bit_time is different from 20ms epoch
>>>>
>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>   In the function NavFix(), there is the program as follow:
>>>>   meas_bit_time_rem = chan[ch].meas_bit_time%50;
>>>>    if ( meas_bit_time_rem == bit+1 ) meas_bit_time_offset = -1;
>>>>    if ( meas_bit_time_rem == bit-1 ) meas_bit_time_offset = +1;
>>>>    if ( meas_bit_time_rem == 0 && bit == 49 ) meas_bit_time_offset = -1;
>>>>
>>>>I think transmit bit time is the same with 20ms epoch's value. However, sometime I found them are different. I wanna know why? Why  meas_bit_time_offset  is not equal zero? Why it shoud be -1,0,or 1? Is it can be more than -1,0,or 1, e.g 4,-4?
>>>>
>>>>I'm looking forward for your reply.
>>>>Best Regards!
>>>>
>>>>                                                                                             Yours
>>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>From: <[email protected]>
>>>>To: <[email protected]>
>>>>Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 3:00 AM
>>>>Subject: opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Send opensource_gps mailing list submissions to
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>> than "Re: Contents of opensource_gps digest..."
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   1. Re: About pull_in state Parameter (??)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>> Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 17:58:40 +0800
>>>>> From: ?? <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSource_GPS] About pull_in state Parameter
>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>> Message-ID: <003501c8b672$4763d0f0$7001a8c0@dlmu7657b7f615>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I still wonder why we choose 45 deg as  the threshold ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> And I have another question. According to what ,you decide  the bandwide of the code loop and carrier loop? Did you do some simulation? Would you send me something  about the simulation?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looking forward for your reply.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> 
>>>>>                                                    Yours,
>>>>>                                                    Jiang Yi
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "Clifford Kelley" <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: "??" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:56 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSource_GPS] About pull_in state Parameter
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The threshold for power is set at the sqrt of 2 times the rms value.  To approximate this with integer values it was multiplied by 14 first and then divided by 10.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1200 was chosen as an approximate value of 45 deg based on the scaling used in the 4 quadrant arc tangent function.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I hope this helps,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cliff
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>From: ?? <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>Sent: May 8, 2008 7:41 PM
>>>>>>>To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>Subject: [OpenSource_GPS] About pull_in state Parameter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Dear Sir:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm a graduate student. I'm very interested in OSGPS. I wanna know the detail about OSGPS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In the end of pull_in state, the software use    if (c->avg > 14 * rms / 10  && c->th_rms < 12000  && c->ms_set) as the condition for track state.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>My problem :
>>>>>>>1   avg > 14 * rms / 10  ,what's the meaning  of 14 and 10
>>>>>>>2    c->th_rms < 12000   why should we choose 12000 as the the threshold
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Looking forward for your reply!
>>>>>>>Best Regard!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>>>From: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 3:00 AM
>>>>>>>Subject: opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Send opensource_gps mailing list submissions to
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>>>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>>>>> than "Re: Contents of opensource_gps digest..."
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   1. ???? ([email protected])
>>>>>>>>   2. Re: Why add 0.5 in pull_in and track parameter (??)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 12:00:42 -0700
>>>>>>>> From: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Subject: [OpenSource_GPS] ????
>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>>>>> URL: http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/pipermail/opensource_gps/attachments/20080507/78933d21/attachment.html 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Message: 2
>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 09:55:09 +0800
>>>>>>>> From: "??" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSource_GPS] Why add 0.5 in pull_in and track
>>>>>>>> parameter
>>>>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <000b01c8b0ae$8e56a420$7001a8c0@dlmu7657b7f615>
>>>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Dear Sir:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I found Open Source software is :
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> pull_carr_C1=(int) (1.69852*Bnpullcarr/Carrier_DCO_Delta/(4.0+5.333*Bnpullcarr/1000.0+(1.8856*Bnpullcarr/1000.0)*
>>>>>>>>  (1.8856*Bnpullcarr/1000.0))+0.5);
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> pull_carr_C2=(int) (0.6369183/Carrier_DCO_Delta*(1.8856*Bnpullcarr/1000.0)*(1.8856*Bnpullcarr/1000.0)*1000.0/
>>>>>>>>  (4.0+5.333*Bnpullcarr/1000.0+(1.8856*Bnpullcarr/1000.0)*(1.8856*Bnpullcarr/1000.0))+0.5);
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> pull_code_C1=(int) (10.598/Code_DCO_Delta*Bnpullcode/(4.0+5.333*Bnpullcode/1000.0+(1.8856*Bnpullcode/1000.0)*
>>>>>>>>  (1.8856*Bnpullcode/1000.0))+0.5);
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> pull_code_C2=(int) (4.028/Code_DCO_Delta*(1.8856*Bnpullcode/1000.0)*(1.8856*Bnpullcode/1000.0)*1000.0/
>>>>>>>>  (4.0+5.333*Bnpullcode/1000.0+(1.8856*Bnpullcode/1000.0)*(1.8856*Bnpullcode/1000.0))+0.5);
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I know C1 C2  is 
>>>>>>>> pull_carr_C1 = 1/(Ko*Kn)*8*zeta*On*Ts/(4+4*zeta*On*Ts+(On*Ts)^2);    
>>>>>>>> pull_carr_C2 = 1/(Ko*Kn)*4*(On*Ts)^2/(4+4*zeta*On*Ts+(On*Ts)^2); 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> By compared, I wonder why add 0.5 to C1 and C2
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>>>> From: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:00 AM
>>>>>>>> Subject: opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Send opensource_gps mailing list submissions to
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>>>>>> than "Re: Contents of opensource_gps digest..."
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>   1. osgps run under windows xp (yuguangzhan)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Message: 1
>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 12:05:10 +0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>>>> From: yuguangzhan <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> Subject: [OpenSource_GPS] osgps run under windows xp
>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi, Cliff:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I purchased a GPS1005  PCI bus board on year 2007 from GPS Creations. Now we 
>>>>>>>>> want to run it under windows xp.So we wonder if  the opensource_gps code can 
>>>>>>>>> run in windows xp and if there is a windows WDM driver available. 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Could you please advise how could I proceed in order to find
>>>>>>>>> such driver? Do you know anyone else who could have it available?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> yuguang.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> opensource_gps mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> End of opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 1
>>>>>>>>> *********************************************
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> opensource_gps mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> End of opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 2
>>>>>>>> *********************************************
>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>opensource_gps mailing list
>>>>>>>[email protected]
>>>>>>>http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>>>
>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>> URL: http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/pipermail/opensource_gps/attachments/20080515/532844ef/attachment.html 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> opensource_gps mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> End of opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 4
>>>>> *********************************************
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>opensource_gps mailing list
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Message: 3
>>> Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 06:07:48 +0000 (UTC)
>>> From: yuguangzhan <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [OpenSource_GPS] the GPS1005
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>> 
>>> Hi everyone
>>> Does anyone have the PCI version of the GPS1005 from GPS Creations.I am 
>>> looking for the GPS1005 receiver kit.If you have one,please send me.My email 
>>> is <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> yuguangzhan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> opensource_gps mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>>> 
>>> 
>>> End of opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 6
>>> *********************************************??i??'?????h??&
>> 
>> ------------------------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> opensource_gps mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps
>> 
>> 
>> End of opensource_gps Digest, Vol 49, Issue 7
>> *********************************************
>_______________________________________________
>opensource_gps mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensource_gps