RE: GRTOBJAUT...does anyone know

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.ibm.midrange
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The 8,000 count was only for one of the libraries.  There are about 20
libraries with a varying number of objects in each library for a total of
over 50K objects.  I am down to about 150 objects across all libraries that
need to be adjusted now.

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces-+hD5IHI5Xscn3HwCXmMcX9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> On Behalf Of Don
Brown via MIDRANGE-L
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2026 5:36 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <[email protected]>
Cc: Don Brown <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: GRTOBJAUT...does anyone know

   For 8000 objects I would just run the grtobjaut command on all objects.

   Unless there is a requirement to know which objects need to be updated.

   This will take a minute whereas writing a program will take much longer
   relatively speaking.

   My 2 cents

   Cheers
   Don

   B 

   Don Brown

   Senior Consultant
   B 
   [1]OneTeam IT Pty Ltd
   P: 1300 088 400

   -----Original Message-----
   From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces-+hD5IHI5Xscn3HwCXmMcX9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> On Behalf Of
   [email protected]
   Sent: Monday, 11 May 2026 11:13 PM
   To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
   <[email protected]>
   Subject: GRTOBJAUT...does anyone know

   We are in the process of cleaning up / tightening up security on our
   production machines.

   One of the many libraries has about 8,000 objects in it and all but about
   100 have the correct authorities. If I do a GRTOBJAUT for *ALL objects in
   the library, does anyone know if the command is smart enough to only look
   at and only adjust the objects that do not have the particular
   supplemental group or does it try to adjust all 8,000? I'm trying to
   figure out if it would be more efficient to build a CL with just the
   objects that are problems.

   And please do not suggest using authorization lists. I'm working toward
   that but trying to get a handle on why the authorities are what they are
   (and that would politely be called "a mess") has been like trying to turn
   a barge with an oar. I'm slowing getting there but is it taking forever
so
   we are taking an intermediate step first.

   --
   This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
   list To post a message email: [email protected] To subscribe,
   unsubscribe, or change list options,
   visit: [2]https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
   or email: MIDRANGE-L-request-+hD5IHI5Xscn3HwCXmMcX9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
   Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
   [3]https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

   Please contact support-FMtJrHiV//lnDLsaKlm4mFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org for any subscription related
   questions.

   --
   Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
   filtering.
   [4]https://www.mailguard.com.au

References

   Visible links
   1. https://www.oneteamit.com.au/
   2. https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
   3. https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
   4. https://www.mailguard.com.au/

-- 
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request-+hD5IHI5Xscn3HwCXmMcX9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support-FMtJrHiV//lnDLsaKlm4mFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org for any subscription related questions.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.